Monday, June 6, 2011

Year 1, Day 157: Deuteronomy 6

The Shema: “Hear, oh Israel”

“Hear, oh Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.”  Among Old Testament historians, this has got to be one of the most famous and often quoted verses in the Bible.  It is the foundation and cornerstone upon which much of what we call theology is built – both Old Testament and New Testament.

But what does it mean? 

There are people out there that lift up this verse as an anti-Trinitarian verse.  They teach that this verse argues against the Trinity.  But to make that claim absolutely implies a lack of complete understanding of the Hebrew word for “one” in this passage.  This Hebrew word can mean “alone” but it can also mean “altogether” or even “a united whole.”  As examples of how this word is used and translated elsewhere, look at Numbers 13:23.  Here we see that the spies into Canaan cut down a “single” cluster of grapes.  The word that many translations translate as “single” is the same word that we have here in Deuteronomy 6:4.  We understand a single cluster of grapes to be a single entity, but that entity is made up of more than one part.  If we look at Judges 20:1 we hear about all of Israel coming together and assembling as “one man.”  Again, this is the same Hebrew word as is used in Deuteronomy 6:4.  We know that the Hebrew congregation was acting as a single unit, but it was composed of many individuals.  So when we look at this verse, we must not think of the word “one” as something that prohibits the New Testament understanding of the Trinity.  Rather, we should see this word as a word that can mean a single unit composed of multiple parts.  This is not too far from saying that we believe in one God, but three persons within that God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Love the Lord Your God

Of course, this understanding of God leads us into the following verse.  “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your might.”  Loving God is the duty for His people.  It is the whole of the Law.  If we love God and act out that love, we will automatically be following the Law.  When we are disobeying the Law, we are by definition not acting out of our love for God.  When we disobey the Law we are acting out of our love for ourselves.  Since God is one, there is no wiggle room.  We either love the one God and therefore act out His love or we do not.

Reproduction of Faith: Bearing Fruit

Again we get the emphasis of parents teaching the children.  Moses tells us that the Word of God is so important that we should be teaching it when we wake, when we go to lay down, when we eat, while we’re in our house, when we go out of our house, etc.  There is nothing more important in this world than teaching people about God.

In Christianity, the word discipleship gets flung around quite frequently.  What is discipleship except teaching the next generation of faith bearers?  It does my heart good to hear that discipleship was one of the key foci of the Old Testament as well as the New testament.

Warning

This leads us into the warning that pretty much covers the rest of the chapter.  Moses tells the people that when they receive their inheritance and they benefit from many things that they had no part in creating for themselves, they had better watch out or they will forget about God.  Everything the Hebrew people are about to receive is purely a gift from God!

This is really a huge warning, because we actually know the history of the Hebrew people.  They stay focused under Joshua.  But under the judges there is an ebb and flow of faith.  Under Samuel there is a little resurgence of faith.  Under Saul, it ebbs away.  Under David, the faith comes back.  But starting with Solomon it starts to fall away rather rapidly.  After Solomon the Hebrew people embrace the worship of other gods while dwelling in the luxury that God has provided.

So it is with us, really.  Sure, I can make the claim that I worked hard and got myself through school.  But did not God put me in a family that nurtured me and taught me a great work ethic?  Did not God put me in a family that taught me to love Him?  Did not God give me the intelligence and the desire to read His Word?  Did not God lead me in every decision – not that I always listened or followed God, mind you?  Have I really done anything on my own that resulted in my own benefit?  Does not all the credit for everything good in my life belong to God in the first place?  When I am lazy or self-glorifying or even proud of the fruit of my own efforts, am I not really denying God the praise that should go to Him? When I focus on how much I’ve earned through my hard work, am I not missing the point entirely?

We are in the same peril as the Hebrew people.  All of us in this world are in such peril.  We are all in places to be prone to forget that everything we have is from God’s hand.  We like to think we earned it with the sweat of our brow.  We like to think we deserve it because we worked hard to achieve it and possess it.  But is that really true?  Could we have done anything had God not given us the ability, desire, and strength to accomplish it?

Word for the wise: stop today and do some serious thanking to God for all the things in your life that He has brought to you.


<>< 

3 comments:

  1. Greetings PJ

    Deut. 6.4 is totally incompatible to the Trinity.

    Look at Mark 12.28ff.
    Note the scribe's response:
    (Mark 12:32) And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one God; and there is none other but he:

    Obviously then, neither Jesus nor the scribe were trinitarian!
    So neither should we be!!

    So, on the subject of the meaning of the Hebrew word for “one” in this passage,
    I recommend this article:
    Elohim and Echad

    On the subject of the Trinity,
    I recommend this video:
    The Human Jesus

    Take a couple of hours to watch it; and prayerfully it will aid you in your quest for truth.

    Yours In Messiah
    Adam Pastor

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sir,

    I appreciate your comments, and I have read through them and the links that you provide. However, I find the force of your argument unconvincing. And it will likely remain that way. I am open to civil discussion, but please be warned that uncivil discussion will be removed.

    John Scott tells us that "Forgiveness is for God the Father the profoundest of problems." Here's why:

    Proverbs 17:15 tells us the "He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous are both alike an abomination to the Lord." So there are four possibilities with Jesus which lead to the following assertions:

    1. Jesus is fully divine but not a sin-free human. If this is true, then there was no proper condemnation of humanity. Humanity is let off the hook without condemnation and according to the Proverb God is an abomination to Himself.

    2. Jesus is a fully sin-free human but not divine. If God sent a supposedly non-divine sinless human Jesus to die, then according to the Proverb He makes Himself out to be an abomination since he just condemned a truly innocent man. So if Jesus was sinless and non-divine God makes Himself out to be an abomination by condemning Jesus to death.

    3. Jesus is neither divine nor a sin-free human. If Jesus had sin, then His sacrifice is nothing for us. And worse, if this is true then scripture is shown to be a liar as several places (2 Corinthians 5:21 as an example) state that Jesus had no sin.

    4. Jesus was both fully sin-free human and fully divine. This is the only option that remains.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Furthermore (sorry, the editor only allows a certain number of characters):

    You see, the non-divinity of Jesus poses quite the problem for the Father if He is true to His Word. It's really a simple point. Assuming we can agree that Jesus' state of sin had to be sin-less, then the real question is whether Jesus is divine or not.

    If he is divine, then we either have one God (the plural - or royal - understanding of "one") or we have more than one God. Having more than one God is a contradiction to the testimony of the Hebrew scriptures, so if Jesus is divine we are only left with the plural understanding of the Hebrew word for "one."

    If Jesus was not divine, then the New Testament is again made out to be a liar. Here's some examples:

    1. John 1:1-4,14 tells us that the Word was in the beginning, it was God, and the Word became flesh in Jesus. So if Jesus is not divine then this passage is a lie.

    2. Colossians 1:15-20 tells us not only that Jesus is the image of the invisible God but also that the fullness of God was within Jesus. This passage would seem to be made out to be a lie if Jesus is not divine.

    3. Jesus does call Himself God. In Mark 2:1-13 we understand quite clearly that Jesus (The Son of Man) has the power to forgive sins. We also confess that God alone has the power to truly forgive sin. Since Jesus declares that He has the power to forgive sin, He is by default claiming divinity for Himself.

    John 10:30 tells us that Jesus Himself confesses that He and the Father are One. If nothing else, this verse alone supports the teaching that a pluralistic understanding of Deuteronomy 6:4 is not only in order but preferred. Clearly it is Jesus' point to claim that he is God because He does not refute the Jews' claim in v. 33 that He ahs made Himself God. Rather, he reinforces it by saying that it is not He who does the work but the Father.

    John 20:28 gives us a picture of Jesus and Thomas in which Thomas calls Jesus "my Lord and my God." Jesus does not condemn Thomas for attributing godship to Him. Rather, Jesus commends Thomas for believing correctly!

    Colossians 2:9 tells us that in Christ the fullness of the deity dwells.

    There are other places I could go with this, but I think this makes my point clear. If Jesus was not divine, much of the witness of the New Testament is made a liar and if a liar it is untrustworthy.

    The only conclusion that reamins is that Jesus is divine and either we have a trinitarian (pluralistic) understanding of the divine or we have more than one God. If there is more than one God, then the witness of the Old Testament is made to be a liar. The only reasonable conclusion that keeps the Old and New Testaments from being made out to be liars is one in which Trinitarian understanding of God is upheld and the "royal" plurality of the word "one" is upheld in Deuteronomy 6:4.

    Again, I appreciate your comments but the witness of scripture leads me to assert that your understanding is not correct. Jesus is divine, Jesus asserts His divinity, and Jesus accepts it when others assert His divinity. It is within scripture, and it is what I believe.

    Now, don't get me wrong. I cannot claim to understand it completely. Understanding the Trinity has baffled people for thousands of years and I would be a fool to think I can figure it out perfectly. But, it is something I must believe purely on the basis of scripture.

    ReplyDelete