Ahaz – The Beginning of the End
Today we
meet Ahaz in Judah and we see the beginning of the downward spiral in
Judah. Ahaz does not do what was right
in the eyes of the Lord. Ahaz does
despicable things – especially with respect to the practices of the Canaanites
who were in the land before God brought His people into the land. In fact, we even hear that Ahaz sacrificed his
own son on the altar – a far cry from the father of his people, Abraham, who
trusted in God to provide the sacrifice!
As we have seen in Israel, when the leadership falls away, the decline
of the people is sure to happen unchecked.
Then we
have the story about Syria and Israel coming up to wage war against Ahaz in
Judah. It seems as though Ahaz does the
opposite of Pekah in that he goes to Assyria and asks for help. Yesterday I griped about Pekah going against
God’s will, so surely today I should support Ahaz, right?
No. Doing the opposite of a wrong action does not
always make a righteous action. In fact,
I would seldom say that doing the opposite of a wrong action turns out to be a
right action. Yesterday I commented that
Pekah is resisting Assyria and that Assyrian was the agent of God’s correction
so therefore Pekah is going against God.
One might think that embracing Assyria (as Ahaz appears to be doing)
would therefore be right. Again, though,
let me reiterate: no.
Assyria
was God’s choice to bring the Israelites into captivity, not Judah. Assyria was God’s agent against Israel. Up until now, the kings of Judah had been
doing an alright job in leading the people and God’s anger was not burning
against the people as was His anger burning against Israel. So Ahaz is not embracing God’s plan, Ahaz is
actually refusing to believe in God by embracing something that is not God’s
plan!
Let me
explain this a little more fully. In
Isaiah 7:1-9 we hear about a message the Lord gives to Isaiah as Israel and
Syria come to battle against Judah. God
tells Isaiah to go before Ahaz and tell him to not fear these two nations. God tells Ahaz that God will deliver
them. But what does Ahaz do? Ahaz goes and makes a treaty with
Assyria. Ahaz puts more faith in the
help of another nation than he puts in God.
Is there any wonder that between this and the sacrifice of his son that
God has an issue with Ahaz?
By
struggling against Assyria in the last chapter, Pekah was struggling against
God’s plan for Israel. By embracing
Assyria, Ahaz was struggling against God’s plan for Judah. Now while it might sound like I am talking
out of both sides of my mouth, there is a very good reason I have spent all
this time unpacking this thought. It is
important that we as human beings do not assume that the opposite of an evil act
is good. As we see in the actions of
these kings, the opposite of an evil act my actually be yet another evil act!
We can
learn a tremendously important lesson here: the only act that is good is an act
that is in line with God’s will. Let’s
look at the prior examples in this light.
- Pekah should have humbled himself to God and asked God what was His will for Israel. He would have discovered that God desired Israel to learn about polytheism under the thumb of Assyria so that they might appreciate the monotheistic faith of the Hebrew people (of course, among a bunch of other lessons).
- Ahaz should have humbled himself to God and asked God what was His will for Judah. He would have discovered that God wanted Judah to again see God’s power and specifically God wanted to teach Ahaz the importance of depending on God.
Since
neither man humbles himself before God, their actions are unjust. Their actions are polar opposite from each
other, but one is just as evil as the other.
Neither man leads in a way that pursues God’s desires; therefore both
men are guilty of doing evil in the eyes of the Lord. This is a huge lesson for us to learn
today. The only good act is an act that
is based upon God’s will.
What is
the end of this for Ahaz? As Ahaz relies
upon the strength of other men, he also learns the worship of other men. He begins to duplicate what he sees in
Damascus. He misses an opportunity to
see the greatness of the Lord and He falls further away from God. So it is with people who step out on their
own understanding and don’t stop to check with God’s will.
<><
One of the acts that King Ahaz is indirectly responsible for the idea of Gehenna (a Greek word for Hell, place of the dead, underworld, etc...) coming into Hebrew culture.
ReplyDeleteYou see, Ahaz designates a particular valley known as the "Valley of the Son of Hinnom" to the Canaanite god Ba'al. Later, King Josiah (who tries to reform Israel) sees this valley as a disgrace and essentially turns the whole valley into a garbage dump. In doing so, the valley (whose name was once "Gehinnom") has its name changed to "Gehenna." And the idea of gehenna as being a place you don't want to be makes its transition into Hebrew culture!
Cool example john, of really demonstrating that the oppoisite of wrong can still be wrong. I think that is a common misconception. I also liked the bonus history lesson :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, Tom. I know that it is a misconception that I buy into more than I should.
ReplyDeleteAnd I should apologize for the delay in my response to a comment. Normally I respond pretty quickly, but Blogger forgot to E-mail me a notification of the comment. So ... I missed it. Fortunately I have the gadget on the right side of the blog that I check periodically. That's where I saw that you had made a comment.