Tabernacle = Tent
Here in Exodus 25, we see that the Lord asks for a
tabernacle. I think we really miss out
on how significant this is. We think of
God in the Old Testament and we primarily think of the Temple in Jerusalem as
His dwelling. But no! That is the building that David asks to build
and Solomon actually gets to build it.
When God asks for a building for Himself, He wants a tabernacle. And what is a tabernacle? Well, the word in Hebrew actually means a
“large portable tent.”
Get ready for a rant.
I’m in a foul mood today, and when I am in a foul mood I tend to be
blunt. Who am I kidding? I’m blunt to begin with. When I am in a foul mood I get honest. So I inform you of my honest evaluation
beforehand, but make no apologies because I think the words that follow are
true.
Why a tent? Well,
tents can be moved around.
Why would the tent need to be moved? The physical answer is because the Hebrew
people were now at Mount Sinai and would be heading into Canaan. But if we are satisfied with that answer then
I think we really miss out on the spiritual answer. God dwells in a movable large tent because
God believes the His work is always on the move! God is never static, so why on earth would we
want a static place to worship Him?
Ouch. That really
hurts today. If God doesn’t want a
static place to be worshipped, then the only reason to have a static place to
worship is because we want it. We want
it, not God! That’s a pretty stark
realization, to be honest.
Why do we want something static? Well, again, because we would prefer to be
comfortable in our faith life and we would rather not realize that our faith
should really be on the move. When we
have a rigid building we can say “This is the space where faith happens in my
life.” We want a static place of
worship. We want routine. We want … {gasp}
… control.
God’s Agenda or My Agenda
What if we’ve screwed up God’s will for 3,000 years? What if Moses got it right and David helped
corrupt it back into the ways of the world?
Let’s face it, we know that while David had a great heart for God, he
isn’t known for his wonderful discernment for making good decisions.
What if by building our rigid structures for worshipping God
we’ve actually been building places to limit God and instead to worship our need
for control? Again, ouch. There are some really beautiful churches out
there. But are they monuments of faith? Or are they monuments of human ingenuity
displaying our ability to build something we want and perhaps God doesn’t
really want? Does our faith always
happen within those grand places of worship or does faith happen in the
personal expressions we have with one another?
So let’s go a little New Testament here. Jesus went to synagogues, yes. Paul, Peter, James, and John also went to
synagogues. But the word synagogue is
composed of two parts. The prefix “syn”
means “with” or “together.” {As in the word synergy – a bringing
together of two distinct elements}
The other part of synagogue is the Greek word “agein” which means “to
bring” or “to lead.” So the word
synagogue literally means “a place of coming together” or “a place of leading
with others.” Synagogue wasn’t
originally a word used to describe a building – although it certainly became
that. In the same way the word “church”
wasn’t meant to describe a building (or even the contents of that
building). It was a word used to
describe who was gathered and the purpose for which they were gathered.
So when Jesus, Paul, Peter, James, John, etc go to synagogue
it is really saying they went to do faith with one another rather than to say
that they went to a specific place. I
think that is a very important understanding we should not miss. We can do synagogue or church in the car, at
a neighbor’s house, in our basements, at a restaurant, etc!
But no, we too often get to thinking that the building is
what is important. Our building limits
our scope. Our building limits our
perspective. We get roped into thinking
“Wow, we need more people on Sunday morning to help pay to keep this building
running” when we should be thinking “I need to go talk to more people about
their relationship with Jesus Christ.” I
think we have seriously screwed up our concept of faith, church, synagogue,
etc. God asks for a tabernacle that can
go with us throughout our life and we give him a rigid temple – or church – in
order to confine Him to a certain area in our life.
Okay, I think I’ve made my point – probably a little too
sternly. I guess I just look around and
see far too many people concerned about the sustaining of their buildings and
their traditions and not really caring whether the people around them are in a
relationship with God or not. So, I rant
from time to time about it.
The Ark
As I read the next passage for the Ark of the Covenant, the
same thought hit me. What is special
about the ark? It can be moved! It can be brought to wherever a physical
demonstration of God’s presence was needed!
Again I can’t help but think about how portable this initial faith was
designed by God. I can’t help but think
how we have worked so hard to establish ways of confining that blessed
portability in our lives.
Giving Unto God
Before I end, let’s say something about the tabernacle and
its contents that is different than portability. Do you also see how it is made of the best of
the best? God had let the Hebrews
plunder the Egyptians. They had the best
Egypt had to offer. Now He asks for a
bit of that back. It is an expectation
of trust and gratitude. I think it is
fair for God to ask for a portion of what He gives to us. That doesn’t mean our churches have to be
fancy, but it does mean that we shouldn’t be sloppy about it either. God’s asks for a genuine presence, not an
afterthought.
<><
I wish there was a "Like" button for Blogger!
ReplyDeleteI agree with Andromache331, wanted that a few times myself on this blog.
ReplyDeleteDoesn't offend me at all.... Imagine how much good work all that fixed assets could do. I know of multiple churches right now having fund drives to fix roofs (maintenance) and add on/pay back debt (previous used to add on).
Maybe all churches should be tents, and moved from home to home of the congregation. That would be very interesting witness opportunities -- Hey Joe, what's the big tent for?!??!?
Thanks for the comments. I needed those - if for nothing else to validate my thoughts - which inherently go against such traditional thinking about what "church" is.
ReplyDeleteAs for the tent issue, Tom ... have you ever read Rick Warren's book The Purpose Driven Church? Apparently that is precisely how they started. Rather than buy a building and get tied to property, they rented a tent and set it up every weekend (along with the PA system, chairs, and not to mention tear-down!). Granted, it is still money in tent rental. But one does need to keep out of the rain and heat!
I find it dramatically interesting to know that Rick Warren's group never built a church until they found out how large they were going to be. He claims they never built a building until they hit the 5,000 person mark. Can you imagine worshipping in a temporary place and managing a congregation of 5,000? You'd need some serious discipleship going on there to make the building that irrelevant.
In the end, all of this is to support what you say, Tom. "Hey Joe, what's the tent?" "Well, Bob, come and see."
I have read a few of the Purpose Driven . Didn't know he started in a tent though. I almost did this when I was working a church plant, but chickened out. Maybe I should've followed through? Oh well, perhaps next time!
ReplyDelete