Friday, September 7, 2012

Year 2, Day 250: John 2

Jesus Is Always the Answer

John 2 starts out with a really neat story: the wedding at Cana.  How neat is it to know that by the time Jesus leaves to do His ministry and collect disciples that Mary has already learned that there is a quality about her Son upon which she can rely?  When the wedding runs out of wine, Jesus is her answer.  We know from the other Gospels that Mary does struggle with Jesus’ identity – but for the record, so does everybody.  It is nice to know that while she might struggle with the rest of the world at understanding who Jesus is; she also knows that whatever He is, He is the answer.

In this story, there is a disservice done to us by our typical English translations in Jesus’ response to his mother.  Most translations say, “Woman, what does this have to do with me?”  We hear the word “woman” and assume that Jesus is being cold and distant.  But we need to flip to two other places in the Gospel of John to understand this word.  In John 20:15 Jesus appears to Mary Magdalene and addresses her with this same word, “woman.”  This is not a sharp address at all in John 20:15.  Additionally, in John 19:26 as Jesus is hanging on the cross He looks to His mother and using the same word He says, “Woman, behold your son.”  This is also not a cold or sharp response.

The truth is that this word is just a word of identification.  It is a word that identifies the intended recipient as a female of a sufficient age to be married.  In fact, the Greek language doesn’t even have a separate word for “wife.”  The Greek uses this same word to mean “wife.”  {If you’re curious, the same is true for husband.  The word “husband” in Greek is actually the same word as “man.”}  So this word that we hear in English as a cold and insensitive word is actually a word that can stretch the breadth of meaning from identifying gender to identifying a spouse.  It is a multi-functional word of respect, not a cold and distant retort.

God’s Abundance

Then Jesus has the jars filled with water.  They are filled to the top.  Yes, as some say Jesus may be trying to prove that there was nothing but water in the jars.  But more likely I think that this is a symbol of the fullness and completeness of God’s work.  When God works, He works abundantly.  God doesn’t do anything halfway.

What is the response to God’s action here?  The people are amazed!  The person who is in charge of the wine is amazed!  The people who know what they are talking about are astounded by God’s action.

Jesus is willing to display God’s greatness to those who are willing to see it.  But to those who want to use and abuse God’s work Jesus gives discipline.  We now move from a miracle of Jesus to the complete opposite of the spectrum.

The Temple Context

The temple was supposed to be a place to come in and experience the presence of God.  It was supposed to be a holy place.  As God has freely given to His people throughout their entire history with Him, it was supposed to be that way now. 

Yet, merchants saw the temple as a place to make money.  They knew that they could guilt people into buying animals for sacrifices.  They knew they could charge a tax for exchanging money from the Roman currency to the more ritually pure Jewish temple currency.  People who were coming to find God were put into a vulnerable place and taken advantage of by those who should have been revering God’s space.  These merchants and temple authorities did not desire to look for God.  They desired to look for their own benefit. 

Jesus’ response to the self-monger is always the same: it needs to be driven out of the temple.  If we are the temple of God, why should we expect anything except for Jesus to desire to drive the self-monger out of us, too?

An Easily Missed Paragraph

As we approach the end of this chapter, we have a small paragraph that is tucked away neatly between two powerful passages: the cleansing of the temple and Jesus’ conversation with Nicodemus.  Truth be told, I don’t ever remember studying these verses in the Gospel of John.  But they are incredibly powerful.  I should remember these, but I don’t.  I will in the future – they are that powerful.

John 2:23-25 say that many believed in His name.  Why did they believe?  They believed because they saw the miracles that He was doing.  The believe because Jesus is acting in power.  Seems reasonable, right?

So let me cause you to ponder today.  What does the Bible say is Jesus’ response to their belief?  It’s one thing to hear that many saw Jesus and believed.  But it needs to be tempered with Jesus’ reaction to them.

He would not entrust Himself to them as He would entrust Himself to His disciples.  Jesus didn’t trust them!  In a sense, we can say that while they “believed” in Jesus, Jesus didn’t “believe” in them.

They were responding to the miracles.  They were thinking that Jesus was a pretty neat guy.  They were seeing Him as a wonderful performer.  But were they actually becoming disciples?  Were they devoting their life to Jesus Christ? 

The unfortunate answer is no, they were not.  They “believed in Jesus,” but Jesus never knew them.  This passage is further evidence that one can believe in Jesus in word but not believe in Him in heart.  One can believe in Jesus without actually becoming His disciple. 

As we see here, just because I attest to “believe in Jesus” doesn’t mean that I actually do believe in Him enough to become His disciple.  Just because I say that “I believe in Jesus” doesn’t necessarily mean that Jesus believes in me.  If you are struggling with this point – as you should – go back and read the words of the Bible again.  Don’t trust me, trust God’s Word.

This tiny little paragraph will completely and totally set up the conversation with Nicodemus that will dominate the conversation about the next chapter.  Upon reading these closing verses of John 2, we should be asking ourselves … what needs to happen for Jesus to “believe in me” as He did with His disciples? 

That is one of the most important questions that a disciple can ask.  I cannot stress the importance of that question.  We’ll tackle that question tomorrow.


<>< 

No comments:

Post a Comment