Philip
In Acts 21 we have a really neat story,
one that I referenced in the comments for the post on Acts 8. Here we have Paul on his way back to
Jerusalem to likely end his ministry.
Who is it that Paul goes to see?
Philip. Who was it that took the
Gospel to the Samaritans in the first place and started all of this “non-Jews
can follow Christ?” Philip. It is neat how in Acts 8 we see Philip begins
the process with the Samaritans, in the intervening chapters we see Paul take
up the mantle after Philip is put in Ceasarea by the Holy Spirit, and then in
Acts 21 we see Paul return to Philip as he lays the mantle back down. It is a neat cycle of events that happens
here, and I think we are apt to miss this in a casual reading of the text.
Tyre
Okay, to get to that point I skipped
over the part about Paul visiting Tyre.
There are some neat things in this passage, as well. Notice that Paul has to seek out the
followers of Christ here? He knows they
are here. He doesn’t feel the need to
plant a new church. He goes and finds
them and has unity with them! The world
doesn’t need more churches. The world
needs believing people uniting together and praising God.
The way that the Bible reads, we are
free to assume that Paul didn’t have any experience with the followers of
Christ in Tyre. We aren’t told that Paul
ever went to Tyre. Yet the Christians in
Tyre accept Paul, embrace Paul, and when it comes time for Paul and his friends
to leave they walk him to the boat! Look
at the bond of Christian love that can grow in just a week as long as people
want the Spirit to bind them together!
Caesarea
Then Paul goes to Caesarea as mentioned
earlier. He not only visits Philip
there, but Agabus comes and see him, too!
Again we have cyclical occurrences.
Note that it was Agabus’ prediction of the famine in Jerusalem that
inspired Paul to be out collecting money for the widows and orphans in
Jerusalem. (See Acts 11:28) In a way it was Agabus that inspired one of
the more important aspects of Paul’s mission, and now it is Agabus who is here
to receive Paul and tell him that completing this mission will end in his
arrest. It is amazing to see how God
continues to reuse those who are truly spiritual in another person’s life.
Paul and the Christian Elders
Of course, Paul heads up to Jerusalem
and meets with the elders. The elders
celebrate what the Holy Spirit is doing in Paul. However, the elders are realists. They know that they are sharing the Temple
with traditional Jews. They also know
that there are no doubt many Christians in Jerusalem who are not mature enough
in their faith to accept that the Gentiles can receive God’s Holy Spirit
without becoming a Jew first. The elders
already know that there are people who are actively sowing lies about Paul’s
teaching in order to cause dissention.
(See Acts 21:20-21) As leaders,
they ask Paul to compromise and to assert his Judaism – at least while he is in
Jerusalem.
So Paul does just this. He goes and prepares himself under a
vow. He compromises. And while ultimately I think that the
compromise was a good decision, what does it gain Paul? No doubt Paul has to go back to his Gentile
followers who followed him to Jerusalem and explain that what he is doing is
not necessary at all but rather being done for the spiritually weak in
Jerusalem. What’s worse is that in the
end, Paul still gets arrested!
But Paul knew that danger was
coming. Paul wasn’t looking to avoid the
consequences. Paul simply wanted to make
it easiest for everyone to see in Christ through Paul. That’s the point of the compromise. Paul doesn’t compromise to avoid the
arrest. Paul compromises in an attempt
to bring truth even to them.
Arrest
Paul does get arrested. Notice that he gets arrested over a false
charge even! The Jews in the temple
assume that because they saw Paul earlier in the city with Trophimus - a
Gentile from Asia Minor – that Paul has brought him into the temple! Oh, the danger of making assumptions about
another person’s faith! It gets Paul
arrested and dragged out of the Temple and into the court of the Gentiles. Quite literally Agabus’ prediction comes true
here!
What can we learn? I write this blog as I prepare to preach a
Sunday sermon on Romans 14:1-12. We do
not live to ourselves. In other words,
we should follow Christ’s desire for us, not our own self-mongerism. We do not die to ourselves. In other words, the goal of my life is not to
make decisions that make me live the longest.
Rather, the goal of my life is to make decisions so that should I die I
am dying following what Christ has called me to do. Paul lives this out throughout the whole
passage.
Some talk a good talk. Some even walk a good walk. A few good people will even die for the good
walk. When I die, I’d like to die being
one of those people in the last category.
<><
An Aside About Philip's Daughters
As a comment, let me talk a little
about Acts 21:9. I didn’t talk about it
at all in the blog, but it really deserves some attention. Philip has four daughters who all prophesy.
First, let’s remember the biblical
definition of a prophet. A prophet is
someone who brings God’s Word to their contemporaries. In other words, they give sermons and talk
about God in the life of the people.
They aren’t predictors of the future; prophets are people who try to
evoke change in the people around them!
I believe here we have clear evidence of the welcome role of women in
the Christian church – at least in places where people were spiritually mature
enough to accept it.
Here’s how I know that this is
significant. You see, writing was a
costly process back then. First you had
to buy the equipment, which was not cheap since only 2% of the population knew
how to do it (in other words: demand was very low and this would make the items
rare). Then you had to find someone who
could write and employ them (Much as I believe Theophilus has done here with
Luke).
What is significant about this? Simply put, ancient writers were masters at
writing what was important enough to preserve while leaving out the
unimportant. It isn’t like they had the
printing press and could push out book after book. No, writing was costly and time consuming. They were masters of efficiency!
So when we have a verse like Acts 21:9
– a verse that could easily have been left out and not changed the story in the
slightest – it should get our attention.
Luke could easily have left out this verse and there would have been no
difference in the story about Paul.
Since Luke included it, he must have a reason.
Some argue that Luke includes this to
help identify which Philip Paul visits on his way to Jerusalem. But that is unnecessary. Luke has already done this in Acts 21:8 when
Luke says that Philip was one of the “Seven” (see Acts 6). There is only one Philip in that list, so we
know exactly who Paul visits. Thus Acts
21:9 has nothing to do with identifying Philip.
What is left? Clearly the verse is meant to speak on its
own. It is meant to identify the
daughters. What about the daughters,
then? Well, we are only told one thing
about them. We are told what Luke wants
us to know. They are accepted as being
people who proclaim God’s message to their community. They aren’t just students of the faith; they
are teachers and preachers and proclaimers of faith!
I see this as a clear witness that
women should be allowed in the ranks of the ordained, the teachers of faith, or
whatever other title people use for those who bring God’s Word to their
contemporaries.
As a comment, let me talk a little about Acts 21:9. I didn’t talk about it at all in the blog, but it really deserves some attention. Philip has four daughters who all prophesy.
ReplyDeleteFirst, let’s remember the biblical definition of a prophet. A prophet is someone who brings God’s Word to their contemporaries. In other words, they give sermons and talk about God in the life of the people. I believe here we have clear evidence of the welcome role of women in the Christian church – at least in places where people were spiritually mature enough to accept it.
Here’s how I know that this is significant. You see, writing was a costly process back then. First you had to buy the equipment, which was not cheap since only 2% of the population knew how to do it (in other words: demand was very low and this would make the items rare). Then you had to find someone who could write and emply them (Much as I believe Theophilus has done here with Luke).
What is significant about this? Simply put, ancient writers were masters at writing what was important to preserve and leaving out the unimportant. It isn’t like they had the printing press and could push out book after book. No, writing was costly and time consuming, They were masters of efficiency!
So when we have a verse like Acts 21:9 – a verse that could easily have been left out and not changed the story in the slightest – it should get our attention. Luke could easily have left out this verse and there would have been no difference in the story about Paul. Since Luke included it, he must have a reason.
Some argue that Luke includes this to help identify which Philip Paul visits on his way to Jerusalem. But that is unnecessary. Luke has already done this in Acts 21:8 when Luke says that Philip was one of the “Seven” (see Acts 6). There is only one Philip in that list, so we know exactly who Paul visits. Thus Acts 21:9 has nothing to do with identifying Philip.
What is left? Clearly the verse is meant to speak on its own. It is meant to identify the daughters. What about the daughters, then? Well, we are only told one thing about them. We are told what Luke wants us to know. They are accepted as being people who proclaim God’s message to their community. They aren’t just students of the faith; they are teachers and proclaimers of faith!
I see this as a clear witness that women should be allowed in the ranks of the ordained, the teachers of faith, or whatever other title people use for those who bring God’s Word to their contemporaries.