Background
Esther is
a unique book in that it is one of two books of the Bible that has no direct
mention of God (The other being Song of Solomon). Some – myself included – are known to lift
this up as evidence that something need not always specifically name God in
order to be Christian (or holy) and present a holy message. However, the second century B.C. Jewish
translators were so concerned with this fact that when they were coming up with
the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures they added the word “God” over
100 times to the Greek text!
Traditionally, because of this fact, Protestants only subscribe to the
Hebrew version of this book of the Bible and largely discount the Greek text as
it is highly modified. But it does
certainly give the book an interesting origin!
The events of this book occur under the Persian king Ahasuerus (his name
in Hebrew) or Xerxes (his name in Greek) or Khshayarsha (his name in Persian)
which would date the book to about 483 – 473 B.C.
Confrontation
The book
opens with a passive aggressive confrontation between Vashti (The queen) and
Ahasuerus (Xerxes, the king). Not
wanting to get too deep in the history, the name Vashti is never mentioned in
any historical source outside of the book of Esther. In the Persian texts, Ahasuerus’ wife is named
Amestris. The name difference may be
attributed to the fact that several of the linguistic sounds in her name are
simply not a part of the Hebrew dialect, so she may have had a Hebrew name, a
Greek name, and a Persian name as we know was true of King Ahasueras/Xerxes/Khshayarsha. In any case, historically we know that
Amestris was known for her particular brand of cruelty and self-reliant independence. Certainly this fits the Vashti that we see
presented in the Bible.
If we can
make the historical leap that Vashti is Ahasueras’ wife (and historically we
know that Ahasueras did have but one wife, so it has to be her), then the
points in Esther 1 make a lot more sense.
Given what we historically know about Vashti/Amestris we can get an idea
that she was perpetually causing trouble for Ahasueras. She was cruel and many of her public servants
loathed her presence. She was
self-interested, so she didn’t “play nice with others.” Imagine a royal figure who only cared about
themselves and didn’t care what image she presented to the rest of the world –
especially to people who might actually look up to her as a role model. {Sounds
a lot like our pop-culture sensations of today, doesn’t it?} That is the image of Vashti/Amestris that we
have according to the historical record.
Genuine Concern, Not Chauvinism
Given that
fact, the fear presented by the nobility at the end of this chapter is far more
understandable. So often people only
read this chapter in terms of a “male-chauvinistic mindset.” They read it and think that it is a bunch of
men who are sitting around angry that Vashti is showing some kind of
backbone. So often the nobility and the
king are painted in a negative light because it seems like they are angry that
Vashti won’t bow to their will as a woman.
But this
is just not the case historically. This
is one event in a long line of events that display her self-centered and cruel
nature. The nobles and the king are
genuinely concerned that if she is allowed to continue as queen that the
general public will begin to think that it is okay to be self-interested and
think of nothing other than your own desires.
How many
parents, teachers, pastors, and mentors have had to fight the battle to make
sure that young people pick good role models?
How many times have we had to pick up the pieces when some young person
learns a bad habit or a selfish way of thinking from some celebrity? That is precisely what is going on among the
nobility here in this chapter. The
nobility aren’t interested in some kind of male-chauvinistic domination of
their culture. They are interesting in
promoting a culture where people think of more things than themselves! This opening chapter is not about women’s
rights as much as it is about the communal danger of self-mongerism.
Community, not Women’s Rights
So where
does it leave us? It leaves us with the
understanding that this book is going to revolve around communal issues. There is fear about the image that Vashti
presents to the people, so we can expect to learn a lot about the image that
Esther will bring to the people in contrast to Vashti. We should anticipate that many of the lessons
as we go through this book will center on putting other people and their needs
before our own. This will be a book that
we can expect to learn a fair amount with respect to humility and God’s ability
to use the servant-nature. That is what
we get to anticipate for the next week or so.
I hope you are looking forward to it as much as I am!
<><
No comments:
Post a Comment