More Sex
Sex, sex,
sex. You would think that by reading
Paul’s letters to the Corinthians that Paul was actually writing to a modern
church in the western world. This point
has already been brought out in the great conversations in the comment sections
over the last few days – but it is worth bringing out again. Sometimes reading 1 & 2 Corinthians is
good because it speaks so much to the issues in the western church (and
culture). But sometimes reading these
books is difficult because the message of these books hit so very close to
home.
Clearly
the Corinthian church is having some internal struggles about the issue of
sex. Of course, we as Americans in our
modern culture have the same issue! Let’s
look deeply into Paul’s advice to the Corinthians.
- In an ideal world, people would abstain from sexual relations. Paul says it, it is true, and it must be acknowledged. In a perfect world, it is good for sex to never enter into the picture. If the Christian is genuinely focused on doing God’s will, sex would not even make the priority list. Don’t get me wrong. I’m in no way saying all sex is sin. It’s not. Consensual sex within marriage is in no way a sinful act. It is just that when one becomes married one is innately split away from a unilateral focus. Even when the spouse is genuinely faithful to God there is still a divided set of priorities.
- However, we do not live in an ideal world. Sex does enter into our mind. Sex is a part of the picture. If we are a person who cannot control our physical urges, we should get married simply to avoid the threat of sexual temptation. For the record, notice that Paul speaks to both sides. Paul knows that both women and men have urges. Thus, each woman in this case should have a husband and each man in this case should have a wife.
- Furthermore, sex is not a weapon within the marriage. In fact, consensual sex should actually be seen as relief. If a person is struggling to keep his or her physical urges under control, allowing relief of those urges to happen should be part of the agenda for the spouse {assuming the request is reasonable, of course}. At the very least, spouses should be concerned for each other’s physical needs – or ability to keep their physical urges under control.
I hate to
speak about sex in such a clinical manner.
There are great books in the Bible that speak much more relationally and
much more lovingly about sex and marriage.
But this is not one of them. I
think we should pay attention to the possible reason that Paul speaks no
plainly and so clinically about sex to the Corinthians: they struggle in this
area. When we are in a time of
temptation, that is the right time to talk about things clinically and
matter-of-factly.
Think
about it. If a person has struggles with
an eating disorder, do I talk about how great food tastes? If a person has an alcoholism disorder, do I
talk about the medicinal benefits of consuming small doses of wine? If a person has issues within stealing, do I
talk about all the great material things that I have in my life? No.
When people struggle, we talk clinically about the issue so as to
address the problem in such a way that does not inspire further offense or
compulsion.
In
America, I’m not sure the problem of “sex addiction” is solved by talking about
the sweetness of the marriage union as found in a book like Song of
Solomon. No, I believe the answer to the
problem rests in understanding the clinical purpose of sex and understanding
the potential problems that sex can introduce into our ability to fulfill our calling
from God. I wish I could talk flowingly
about the love that I have for my wife {and
I do!} … but I’m not sure that doing so will actually constructively help to
address the sex problem that America has.
In the same light, I’m not convinced it is wrong either. I’m just saying that I think talking about
the love in my marriage is best saved for after the problem has been resolved
and the offending persons can genuinely appreciate the sentiment without being
drawn into temptation.
Faithfulness
Paul then
talks about a great piece of advice: remain faithful in the position that you
are in. It is possible for a married
person to read these verses and realize that their loyalties are actually
divided between God and their spouse. So
should they pursue divorce so as to be solely devoted to the Lord? No!
One does not draw closer to God by doing that which God does not desire.
It is also possible that a person who
was divorced and remarried before becoming a Christian reads God’s Word and
wonders if they should divorce their second spouse in order to refrain from
committing adultery. Again, I think Paul
would tell us that the answer is no. We
cannot always correct our sinful errors before we become the Lord’s. The only thing that we can genuinely control
is what we do once we become the Lord’s.
In this case, stay faithful to the new spouse and demonstrate the love
of God to the person.
The key in
most of what Paul says in this chapter is the pursuit of God’s will. If you are single and can refrain from sexual
temptation, pursue God with all your heart and you will be satisfied. If you cannot refrain from sexual sin, then become
married – but do not let your marriage inhibit you from pursuing God with all
of your heart. If you sinned in the
past, repent of it and pursue God to the best of your circumstance now that you
are His. If we pursue God’s will and
God’s ways rather than pursuing the desires of our heart, we will never go
wrong.
<><
Ok - first let me say, I thought this was really well written...and done very well clinically! :-)
ReplyDeleteThe thing that I struggled with was your line about "If we are a person who cannot control our physical urges, we should get married simply to avoid the threat of sexual temptation." I would think if I was single and had urges, running out and marrying the first person I come to so as to control those urges might not be my best option. But when I read that comment - that's what my mind jumped to. I think it would be hard to just marry anyone. I think we need to learn self-control and patience (as mentioned in Galations 5:22-23 'fruit of the Spirit'). Wouldn't that be a better route to go than to get married?
Yes, fair enough. Again, that more than likely goes back to my struggle in putting my thoughts down.
ReplyDeleteLet me spin out what I meant a little more deeply. Think of this as a flow chart:
1. Can I go through life without having sex?
YES - Do so. Stay single and serve the Lord with a passionate single-minded focus.
No - Bite the bullet and set yourself up for marriage. Proceed to question 2.
2. Do I know my spiritual gifts and have a sense of where God is calling me in life?
YES - Talk about those with a spiritual mentor and begin to look for a spouse who also is spiritual aware and compliments your calling from God. Proceed to question 3.
NO - Stay single until you do.
3. Have you found a person who is spiritually aware and compliments God's calling for you as much as you compliment God's calling for the potential spouse?
YES - Talk about marriage. Talk about how God will come first in the marriage even over spouse, kids, and work. Talk about your emotional, physical, and spiritual needs and let the potential spouse know that you will expect them to help you meet those needs. Also, listen to your potential spouse's needs list of needs and make sure that you are prepared to take on those as well. If all of that goes well, pray to God for guidance and if it seems like God is guiding ... get married.
NO - Stay single until you do. When you do, revisit step 3.
Does that help any? I feel much much much more comfortable with this comment than I do with the sentence that you lifted out. Not that I think the sentence is wrong ... but as you correctly point out it needs much further explanation.
And looking back on this chunk of discussion regarding marriage/divorce/sexuality and how productive it has been (likely because it's a conversation that is very useful in all our lives) ... I think when I finish "Not My Jesus" that the three of us (or the two of us if Tom isn't interested) should write a book on "Flowing through Relationships and Finding a Spouse."
Yes, that's much clearer and I figured that is what you were trying to say; however, I did read it as "run off and get married". I really like your flow chart! What a great way to process it through.
ReplyDeleteI am game to write a book on relationships. What a neat way that would be to help me grow further in my faith!! :-)