The Work of God
I was reading Richard
Lawrence this morning. Richard makes an
interesting point in his commentary called The
Bible Reader’s Companion. He says, “Some view heaven as a place where the redeemed stand idle,
strumming harps. But throughout the O.T. those who have been closest to God
have been the most active! Heaven will
be filled with work and worship. And
those committed to work and worship experience a foretaste of heaven now!”
Why do I bring forth this point about heaven as we read
about Numbers 8? Well, it is really
simple. This chapter states {again} that the Levites are a special
people, chosen from among the Hebrew people.
But what is it the Levites are called to do? We know from a few chapters ago that they
weren’t allowed to fight. We also know
that they were given a separate place among the community to dwell – as a
buffer between God and the people. This
points us towards what the Levites were called to be. They were not just called to be separate, but
they were called into a work for the Lord.
They didn’t work for themselves. In an interesting twist of fate, they don’t
even work for the Hebrew people, although their work certainly does benefit the
Hebrew people. They work for God and for
God alone. It goes back to the quote
with which I began this blog entry.
Those who are the closest to God are often the most active in His work,
and those truly committed to God now can work and worship God now! As God’s priests under Christ, this same
principle applies to us. Those closest
to God are going to be about His work in this world.
Retirement of the Levites
We then turn to the
retirement of the Levites. They have a
mandated retirement age. However, notice
what it says here. The priests may help
after retirement, but they are not to actually do the work themselves. They can still be involved, but the burden of
responsibility is passed on to the next generation.
I wonder how often
this principle is overlooked in our churches.
How often do people who are afraid of their church “changing” insist on
keeping hold of the reins? Rather than pass
along the baton to the next generation, who are equipped with the ability to
bring about change in order to meet the spiritual sensitivities of the upcoming
generation, people hold onto the reins and intentionally block change. By holding on longer than they should, the
church stays the same while the culture changes around it. Pretty soon the church may have a relevant
message but it has no relevant means by which to communicate this message. This is most easily brought about by people
who are too focused on both preventing change and refusing to trust in the
upcoming generations to lead.
Remembering Leviticus 7
Now, this puts me
back in conflict with the points that I blogged about yesterday. Does the shape of our worship or Christian
life matter so long as it is genuine? If
we are to embrace change, what can be said for appreciating the rote about
which I spoke yesterday? Let’s look at
this from two perspectives:
From God’s
perspective: God desires genuineness in
worship, not perfection. God desires a
heart that longs for Him rather than a rehearsed tradition that happens without
thought. I believe that God can enjoy,
accept, and appreciate true worship in whatever shape that happens to be – so
long as it brings glory to God. This can
be with contemporary music, hymns, guitars and drums, prayer service, liturgies
and a bunch of other things too many to mention.
However, from an
evangelical perspective I believe our worship form absolutely matters. If people are walking into the service and
are uncomfortable, they are not likely to return. Again, the shape of discomfort can take many
forms. Some people may feel discomfort
in traditional liturgy. Others may feel
discomfort in a contemporary style.
Still others may find discomfort in a rock service. Others may find discomfort in a healing service,
or a prayer service, or whatever. There
is no one right form for worship. From a
human perspective it is absolutely important that the worship be structured so
as to be able to be one tool in our evangelistic nature. Ultimately, I think this is one of the main
reasons why the Levites are forced to retire.
They can assist, but they cannot get in the way of ministry meeting the
culture where the culture actually is.
<><
I like the development you do here. I think its a very interesting point as far as relevant delivery method (not message).
ReplyDeleteI can't speak for all churches, but many (and fortunately not all) of the church I was exposed to growing up and even now do have the problem that the elders (and I don't mean in the positional sense, but age sense) run the church. Generally, youth (qualified or not) are not in that "inner circle" that makes it go and makes decisions. I do think that sometimes (perhaps often) leads to inflexibility.
I also agree. And for the record, from a worldly perspective I won't even claim it wrong when the "elders" (as you use the term) hold onto the reins and refuse to allow change into the worship. If they want to remain the same, so long as their worship is true and genuine there is nothing wrong with it.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, from a spiritual side I think that there is everything wrong with it. Remaining the same ultimately leads to no longer being relevant to a changing culture. {It's just inherent, "not changing" automatically means divergence from people who "are changing."} If we become less relevant, we are no longer fulfilling the Great Comission. And that is clearly wrong.
I am glad that you found a church that is forward enough thinking to be willing to wrestle with how to be relevant to the culture while still honoring God. In my experience - and I can tell by your words as well - that is a very rare thing indeed.